← Encyclopedia
Skill
Introduction
Why does the rhyme of an Andalusian muwashshah change several times within a single text while the classical qasida keeps one rhyme from its first line to its last? A reader who approaches the muwashshah with the eye of the traditional ode sees this variety as a metrical disturbance or a copying error, when it is in fact a deliberate structural system with its own terminology: the strophe, the refrain, and the kharja, and these units can only be read once each one's function is known.
Definition and distinction
The muwashshah is an Andalusian genre built on multiple rhymes within a single text, unlike the monorhyme classical qasida. It typically consists of an optional opening (matla') with a shared rhyme, called the qufl or simt, followed by a number of strophes; a strophe (dawr) is the section containing aghsan, verses carrying their own rhyme distinct from the opening's rhyme, and each strophe closes with a qufl that returns to the opening's rhyme or shares at least its final letter with it. The whole muwashshah closes with a kharja, the final qufl, often carrying a different linguistic or dialectal character from the rest of the text. It is sometimes confused with the classical qasida merely because of a superficial similarity in line count, but the essential difference is the multiple-rhyme system, not the number of lines. It is also confused with the opening itself; the matla' is the introductory section if present, while the qufl is a recurring element appearing after every strophe throughout the text, so every matla' is a qufl in terms of rhyme but not every qufl is a matla' in terms of position.
A teaching excerpt composed for this lesson to illustrate the structure, not attributed to any muwashshah poet:
Opening (qufl): O breeze of the garden, blow at dawn / for the lover has stayed sleepless through the night
Strophe (verses with a new rhyme): In cups of longing we drink a cloud / heedless of whatever has befallen / seeking from his phantom what pleased
Refrain (returning to the opening's rhyme): So grant the lovers fortune and reprieve / to heal a heart broken by passion
Kharja (imagined, in a different voice): O my beloved, you came in the night / ah my heart, how sweet you are
Practical application
Step 1: Examine the first section of the text and determine whether it is an opening with a rhyme whose shape will recur later, or whether the muwashshah is "stripped," beginning directly with the first strophe with no preceding opening; both types are documented in the Andalusian tradition.
Step 2: Move to the first strophe and track its verses, counting their internal rhyme independent of the opening's rhyme; the verses share a rhyme specific to that strophe alone, and they often carry a partial metrical variation compared to the refrain.
Step 3: Identify the refrain closing the strophe, and verify it returns to the opening's rhyme or shares at least its final letter; this refrain is the thread linking the multiple strophes together despite the differing rhymes of their internal verses, and it is what grants the muwashshah its unity despite its multiplied rhymes.
Step 4: Isolate the kharja at the end of the text, and check whether it carries a distinct linguistic or dialectal character from the rest of the muwashshah, such as being attributed to another speaking voice, a child, a beloved woman, or a shopkeeper, in colloquial or hybrid language; this vocal shift is an authentic part of the Andalusian kharja tradition, not a copying error or a linguistic weakness.
Context that changes meaning
In early Andalusian muwashshahat documented from the tenth century onward, the kharja was often written in a mixture of colloquial Arabic and local Romance dialects, what researchers call the aljamiado kharjas, and reading it correctly requires knowledge of Andalusian linguistic history, not classical Arabic alone. In later Eastern imitations of the muwashshah, many poets kept the kharja in classical Arabic as well, so the bilingual character lost some of its sharpness while the prosodic and rhyme structure remained the same. In modern attempts to compose muwashshahat, some poets deliberately revive the colloquial kharja as a homage to the original tradition, while others settle for the multiple-rhyme structure without the linguistic shift in the kharja.
Limits of the term and common errors
A common error judges a text to be a muwashshah merely because it is divided into sections, without verifying the actual multiple-rhyme system that distinguishes it from a poem divided only in appearance. Another error assumes every kharja must be in a foreign or colloquial language; this holds for an important part of the early Andalusian corpus but is not an absolute rule applying to every muwashshah in every period. A further error confuses the refrain with the opening, as noted above, assuming every recurrence of a given rhyme marks a new opening rather than a refrain whose function is linking, not introducing. Finally, neglecting to track the strophe as a complete unit, verses then refrain, and settling for a total line count loses the essential difference between the muwashshah and the qasida.
Conclusion
Do not describe a text as a muwashshah merely because it has multiple sections; actually trace the rhyme system from the opening if present, through the strophes with their independent verses, to the linking refrains, to the closing kharja, and if this multiple system is absent, the text is most likely a poem divided in appearance rather than a true muwashshah.