The Rubric Bank — with all five levels

Word clarity and ability to understand without listener effort

Managing breathing to support vocal performance without unintended interruption

Variation in recitation speed and pause timing

Varying voice pitch to serve expression and avoid monotony

Conveying genuine emotions convincing and moving the listener

Producing letters from their correct points of articulation, especially the similar ones

Timing silence between sentences and words to serve meaning and impact

Building a gradient of vocal energy that leads the listener toward the climax

Giving each character in the performance a voice and tone distinguishing it from others

Intentional variation in vocal power between whisper and projection to serve meaning

Highlighting key words through vocal stress to clarify the intended meaning

Convincingly shifting between emotional states without contrived jumps

Maintaining the level and quality of performance from start to finish

The performance's ability to hold the listener's attention and keep them engaged

Bringing out the cadence and meter latent in the Arabic text through delivery

How closely your alif's height in the panel (measured in pixels relative to your own reference dot) matches the documented traditional ratio for the declared script (Naskh ~5 dots, Thuluth ~7 dots) — not measured for scripts outside the classical dot system (Ruq'ah/Diwani/Kufic)

Your writing line's deviation from true horizontal, in degrees, computed by a real geometric Hough transform on your own photo's pixels — never a visual estimate

How consistently your pen's stroke direction holds across several points in your panel, measured from the local ink orientation around each point you mark (a platform-declared measurement standard, not a historical figure) — an unstable pen angle signals inconsistent pen-grip control, not a letter-shape flaw

How consistent the horizontal gap between your letters stays, measured by the coefficient of variation of ink-blob gap widths along the marked line — erratic spacing breaks the reading rhythm even when the letters themselves are sound

How steady the pen's stroke thickness stays along one letter you mark (measured by the coefficient of variation of several cross-section widths along that same stroke) — thickness varying WITHIN one stroke signals uncontrolled pen pressure, unlike the intentional thick/thin contrast between different strokes in the script itself

How steady the same letter's height (relative to your own reference dot) stays every time it recurs across your panel — a real calligraphic principle: one letter must not vary in size within the same piece, independent of any external reference figure

How smoothly the pen moves between connected letters, with no unintended stops or breaks in the ligature — judged by a vision model pointing at a specific location in the image, never a generic impression

The precision of diacritic (tashkil) placement above/below the letter, when present, and its size proportion to the letter itself — when no tashkil appears in the panel, this criterion is explicitly marked not applicable, never silently skipped

The balance of how letters and words are distributed across the whole panel's space, and how the larger gaps (between words and lines) relate proportionally to the smaller ones (between letters)